mercredi 31 décembre 2014

Collected Department Releases: Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Request for Statements of Interest: Programs to Support Transparency, Accountability, Religious Diversity, and Tolerance in Burma


Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Request for Statements of Interest: Programs to Support Transparency, Accountability, Religious Diversity, and Tolerance in Burma




December 30, 2014




Department of State


Public Notice



Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Request for Statements of Interest: Programs to Support Transparency, Accountability, Religious Diversity, and Tolerance in Burma




I. Requested Proposal Program Objectives


The Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) announces a Request for Statements of Interest (SOIs) from organizations interested in submitting proposals for projects that support the bureau’s policy priority of increased transparency and accountability in matters of import to a democratic and inclusive Burma, as well as a diverse, multi-ethnic and multi-religious society that respects the rights of all people. This solicitation does not constitute a formal Request for Proposals: DRL will invite select organizations that submit SOIs to expand their ideas in full proposals at a later date.




PLEASE NOTE: DRL strongly encourages applicants to access immediately www.grantsolutions.gov or www.grants.gov in order to obtain a username and password. GrantSolutions.gov is highly recommended for all submissions and is DRL’s preferred choice of receiving applications. For more information, please see DRL’s Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) for Statements of Interest, as updated in October 2014, available at: http://www.state.gov/j/drl/p/c12302.htm.




DRL invites organizations to submit SOIs for programs to conduct the following:




Furthering transparency and accountability (approximately $297,000 available)


DRL’s objective is for increased transparency and accountability in matters of import to a democratic and inclusive Burma. DRL seeks proposals which support local organizations and civil actors as they press for increased transparency and accountability by national and local governments, and where applicable, business enterprises. DRL seeks proposals which focus on critical issues, including but not limited to: government and military spending, resource-sharing, peace process, economic decision-making, corruption, land use, infrastructure and special economic zone investment. Activities could include:




a. Funding for local organizations to collect and disseminate information about government and security sector activities, facilitating their development into credible watchdog entities. Develop independent think tanks and research institutes that investigate and provide prescriptions regarding corruption, security sector reforms and economic development.




b. Activities which provide an evidence-based foundation for advocacy initiatives led by internal and external activist organizations.




c. Develop the capacity of local civil society organizations to document ongoing abuses using sound methodology and to subsequently liaise with government authorities to end them.




d. Support for budget transparency initiatives led by civil society and increased information about energy governance, EITI and other global transparency initiatives.




e. Technical and organizational development assistance for organizations if specifically tied to promoting activities which promote accountability; activities could include capacity building on representation and negotiation, skills for local and international media outreach, as well as the use of strategic non-violent action.




Building constituencies for religious diversity and tolerance (approximately $495,000 available)


DRL’s objective is a diverse, multi-ethnic and multi-religious society in Burma that respects the rights of all people. DRL seeks proposals with activities that address social, political, and economic factors that contribute to cycles of violence in Burma. Illustrative program examples include:




a. Support grassroots conflict resolution activities involving civil society, government officials, religious and community leaders, women, and youth in ways that bridge ethnic and religious divides and increase tolerance and acceptance. Promote mutual respect through awareness activities meant to increase understanding and acceptance about the diversity of peoples in Burma at local, regional or national levels.




b. Work with government officials and local communities to design ways to recognize and alleviate community tension before it escalates into violence. This could include developing and supporting networks of trained conflict resolution specialists to conduct activities in their communities. Activities could develop/strengthen mechanisms for minority groups to participate in policies that directly affect their communities.




c. Develop the capacity of local civil society organizations to document human rights abuses and violence through sound methodology and to subsequently liaise with government authorities to end abuses. Program activities could include capacity building with organizations on representation and negotiation, skills for local and international media outreach, as well as the use of strategic non-violent action.




d. Support those who press for changes to Burma’s legal code so it offers protections to minorities and the majority populations. This could include anti-discrimination programs to press for changes in laws that systematize racism, provide legal aid to individuals experiencing discrimination (in employment, education etc.), conduct strategic litigation to push for change in policies and laws that allow for religious/ethnic discrimination, and publicize those cases via appropriate media channels.




For both program areas, competitive proposals will: 1) Foster linkages between civil society organizations and relevant government officials; 2) Foster linkages between activists and communities in the core and peripheral areas of the country, and activists representing a variety of issues. DRL prefers proposals which include actors from Rakhine state, but is not seeking Rakhine-only projects; 3) Include a variety of ethnic, national, religious groups, and Burman populations in program activities and leadership opportunities; 4) Incorporate women in training and leadership development; 5) Demonstrate flexibility by discussing how proposed activities can expand or contract under changing political conditions, and recognize the electoral environment of 2015; 6) Prioritize working with a variety of local actors, while identifying how the program will not overwhelm existing absorptive capacity of organizations; 7) Include an output- and outcome-driven program with a strong monitoring and evaluation plan; 8) Outline how your organization will select and vet government officials participating in program activities; and 9) If already working in Burma, organizations should discuss how this proposal complements or expands upon existing projects.




II. Background Information on general DRL funding and Statements of Interest


DRL supports programs that uphold democratic principles, support and strengthen democratic institutions, promote human rights, and build civil society around the world. Funds are available to support projects that have the potential to have an immediate impact leading to long-term sustainable reforms. Projects should have potential for continued funding beyond DRL resources. DRL prefers innovative and creative approaches rather than programs which simply duplicate or add to efforts by other entities.




The submission of a SOI is the first step in a two-part process. After reviewing SOIs, selected organization will be invited to expand their ideas into full proposals at a later date. The intention of requesting SOIs first is to provide organizations with additional time to focus on submitting creative and new ideas to support local organizations and civil actors as they press for increased transparency and accountability by national and local governments, and business enterprises.




DRL will not consider SOIs that reflect any type of support for any member, affiliate, or representative of a designated terrorist organization, whether or not elected members of government.




The information in this solicitation and DRL’s PSI for Statements of Interest, as updated in October 2014, is binding and may not be modified by any DRL representative. Explanatory information provided by DRL that contradicts this language will not be binding. Issuance of the solicitation and negotiation of submission does not constitute an award commitment on the part of the Government. DRL reserves the right to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program evaluation requirements.




This request for proposals will appear on www.grants.gov, www.grantsolutions.gov, and DRL’s website http://www.state.gov/j/drl/p/c12302.htm.




III. Eligibility Information:


Organizations submitting SOIs must meet the following criteria:




  • Be a U.S.-based or foreign-based non-profit organization/non government organization (NGO), or a public international organization; or


  • Be a private, public, or state institutions of higher education; or


  • Be a for-profit organization or business, although there are restrictions on payment of fees and/or profits to the prime recipient under grants and cooperative agreements, including those outlined in 48 CFR Part 30 (“Cost Accounting Standards”), 48 CFR Part 31 (“Cost Principles”), and 22 CFR 145.24(b)(3)(“Program Income”); and


  • Have existing, or the capacity to develop, active partnerships with thematic partners or in-country partners, entities, and relevant stakeholders including industry and NGOs; and


  • Have demonstrable experience administering successful and preferably similar projects. DRL reserves the right to request additional background information on organizations that do not have previous experience administering federal grant awards. These applicants may be subject to limited funding on a pilot basis.


Organizations may form consortia and submit a combined SOI. However, one organization should be designated as the lead applicant.




DRL’s preference is to work with non-profit entities; however there may be occasions when a for-profit entity is best suited. For-profit entities should be aware that its application may be subject to additional review following the panel selection process.


No entity listed on the Excluded Parties List System in the System for Award Management (SAM) is eligible for any assistance or can participate in any activities under an award in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR Part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR Part 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.”


Organizations are not required to have a DUNS (Data Universal Numbering System) number and an active SAM.gov registration to apply for this solicitation through GrantSolutions.gov. If a project is selected for further funding stages, these will need to be obtained.




IV. Application Requirements, Deadline, and Technical Eligibility


Applications must conform to DRL’s posted Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) for Statements of Interest, as updated in October 2014, available at http://www.state.gov/j/drl/p/c12302.htm.




Complete SOI applications must include the following:


1. Completed and signed SF-424 and SF424B, as directed on GrantSolutions.gov or Grants.gov; and,


2. Executive Summary (not to exceed three [3] pages in Microsoft Word) that includes:




a) A table listing:


i. The target country/countries;


ii. The total amount of funding requested from DRL, total amount of cost-share (if any), and total program amount (DRL funds + cost-share); and,


iii. Program length;


b) A statement of work or synopsis of the program, including a brief statement on how the project will have a demonstrated impact;


c) A concise breakdown explicitly identifying the project’s objectives and the activities and expected results that contribute to each objective; and,


d) A brief description of the applicant(s) that demonstrates applicant(s) expertise and capacity to implement the program and manage a U.S. government award.


An organization may submit no more than two applications. Applications that request less than the award floor ($150,000 for transparency / $200,000 for religious diversity) or more than the award ceiling ($297,000 for transparency / $495,000 for religious diversity) will be deemed technically ineligible.




Technically eligible applications are those which:


1) Arrive electronically via GrantSolutions.gov or Grants.gov by 11:59 p.m. EST on Wednesday, January 21st, 2015.


2) Are in English;


3) Heed all instructions and do not violate any of the guidelines stated in this solicitation and the PSI for Statements of Interest.


Applicants should be aware that all awards made on or after 12/26/2014 will be made with terms and conditions subject to the OMB Uniform Guidance: Cost Principles, Audit, and Administrative Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Chapter I, Chapter II, Part 200, et al.). Applications that are submitted before 12/26/2014 for Federal awards to be made on or after 12/26/2014 should be developed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance.


It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all of the material submitted in the grant application package is complete, accurate, and current. DRL will not accept proposals submitted via email, fax, the postal system, or delivery companies or couriers. DRL strongly encourages all applicants, especially foreign or first-time applicants, to submit applications before January 21st to ensure that the application has been received and is complete.




V. Review and Selection Process


AQM will determine technical eligibility for all applications. All technically eligible applications will then be reviewed against the same three criteria by a Department of State Review Panel. Additionally, the Panel will evaluate how the application meets the solicitation request, U.S. foreign policy goals, and the priority needs of DRL overall. Panelists review each application individually against the evaluation criteria, not against competing proposals. To ensure all applications receive a balanced evaluation, the Department of State Review Panel will review the first page of the SOI up to the page limit and no further. DRL encourages organizations to use the given space effectively.




In most cases, the Department of State Review Panel includes representatives from DRL and the appropriate Department of State regional bureau, which may request feedback on applications from the appropriate U.S. embassies. In some cases, additional panelists may participate, including from other Department of State bureaus or offices, U.S. government departments, agencies, or boards, representatives from partner governments, or representatives from entities that are in a public-private partnership with DRL. At the end of discussion on an application, the panel votes on recommending the application for approval by the DRL Assistant Secretary. Once approved by the DRL Assistant Secretary, applicants of successful SOIs will be invited to submit a full proposal based on their SOI. Unless directed otherwise by the applicant, DRL may also refer SOIs for possible consideration in other U.S. government related funding opportunities. The Grants Officer Representative (GOR) for the eventual award does not vote on the panel.


Department of State Review Panels may provide conditions and recommendations on applications to enhance the proposed program, which must be addressed by the applicant before further consideration of the award. To ensure effective use of limited DRL funds, conditions or recommendations may include requests to increase, decrease, clarify, and/or justify costs and program activities.




Review Criteria


1) Quality of Program Idea/Inclusivity of Marginalized Populations


SOIs should be responsive to the solicitation, appropriate in the country/regional context, and should exhibit originality, substance, precision, and relevance to DRL’s mission of promoting human rights and democracy. DRL typically does not fund programs that continue an organization’s ongoing work (funded by DRL or other sources), but prioritizes innovative, stand-alone programs. In countries where similar activities are already taking place, an explanation should be provided as to how new activities will not duplicate or merely add to existing activities and how these efforts will be coordinated. Projects that have a strong academic, research, conference, or dialogue focus may not be deemed competitive. DRL strongly discourages health or science related projects unless they have an explicit component related to the requested program objectives in the solicitation.




DRL strives to ensure its programs advance the rights and uphold the dignity of the most at risk and vulnerable populations, including women, youth, people with disabilities, racial and ethnic minorities, religious minorities, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons. To the extent possible, applicants should identify and address considerations to support these populations in all proposed program activities and objectives as appropriate. Applicants should provide a strong justification if it determines it is not feasible or appropriate to incorporate the most at risk and vulnerable populations within proposed program activities and objectives. Applications that do incorporate the most at risk and vulnerable populations will be viewed favorably in this category.




2) Program Planning


A strong SOI will include a clear articulation of how the proposed program activities and expected results (both outputs and outcomes) contribute to specific program objectives and the overall program goal. Objectives should be ambitious, yet measurable, results focused, and achievable in a reasonable time frame.




3) Ability to Achieve Objectives


SOIs should address how the program will engage relevant stakeholders and should identify local partners as appropriate. If local partners are identified, applicants should describe the division of labor among the direct applicant and any local partners. SOIs should demonstrate the organizations’ expertise and previous experience in administering successful projects, preferably similar projects targeting the requested program area or similarly challenging program environments.




For additional guidance, please see DRL’s posted Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) for Statements of Interest, as updated in October 2014, available at http://www.state.gov/j/drl/p/c12302.htm.




VI. Contact Information


GrantSolutions.gov Help Desk:




For assistance with GrantSolutions.gov accounts and technical issues related to using the system, please contact Customer Support at help@grantsolutions.gov or call 1-866-577-0771 (toll charges for international callers) or 1-202-401-5282. Customer Support is available


8 AM – 6 PM EST, Monday – Friday, except federal holidays.


Grants.gov Helpdesk:




For assistance with Grants.gov accounts and technical issues related to using the system, please call the Contact Center at 1-800-518-4726 or email support@grants.gov. The Contact Center is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, except federal holidays.





For questions related to SOI submissions please contact Linnea Beatty at BeattyLM@state.gov or 202-632-2065.




With the exception of technical submission questions, during the solicitation period U.S. Department of State staff in Washington and overseas shall not discuss this competition with applicants until the entire proposal review process has been completed and rejection and approval letters have been transmitted.





The Office of Website Management, Bureau of Public Affairs, manages this site as a portal for information from the U.S. State Department.
External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views or privacy policies contained therein.



Source: Dept. Of State – Releases


    



Collected Department Releases: Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Request for Statements of Interest: Programs to Support Transparency, Accountability, Religious Diversity, and Tolerance in Burma

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire